Tuesday, October 2, 2007

Group Prospectus

Overview:

Introduction: (Alex V. & David J.)

With our project it is our group’s job to dive into the dynamics of digitization and what it exactly means. In order to do this we will discover what contents can be digitized and forms of presentation and organization of those contents. We’ll also review digitization’s benefits and drawbacks from different perspectives, such as experts in the field of digitization (digitizers), any reference librarians, and a “professional” user perspective.

While researching these three perspectives we’ll dive into smaller sub areas listed below:

Digitizer: (Alex V. & David J.)

· Costs of Digitization (copyright, support, materials, etc.)

· Level of cooperation between libraries (Unnecessary to copy the same book numerous times when it’s already been digitized)

Reference Librarian: (Alex C. & Brandon)

· Management of Information and databases (relevance of information and ease of access)

· How digital libraries compare to traditional libraries (How to present information due to the fact that its massively larger than a traditional libraries archives)

· To discover the actual usage of the reference librarian services as a middle-man

“Professional” User: (Andrew and David M.)

· Benefits of obtaining digitized information

· Problems that occur when trying to access digitized information (Dealing with the massive amount of information and finding the most relevant to what you need)

· What he/she thinks digitization might become in the future

Group Plan:

All of the perspectives above lead to a great interview opportunity to satisfy our human element requirement. Within our group we will split our six into teams of two to research each perspective. When completed we will come back together as a group to share our research and combine our thoughts and ideas to develop our final presentation.

6 comments:

Brandon Blalock said...

This is great guys. I don't think anyone could have writen it better. You know though, I had an Idea, what if each group of two did their interview in a different way. For example, one group does a video where they interview the person face to face. Another group does an interview over AIM. Another group does an interview using a tape or audio recording. Then combine each interview into a powerpoint or something. Cauz I think we are going to be graded on HOW WELL we teach the information we discovered to the rest of the class. I dunno, just a thought, I'm throwing possibilities out there.

Brandon Blalock said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
David McCollum said...

Looks good, we now need to decide who is going to be in each of the 3 pairs, and then organize our week-by-week plan. I liked the point about digitization between libraries, that makes a lot of sense.

David Joyner said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
David Joyner said...

I’d like to thank the Alex & Alex for there superb contribution, a solid foundation that will make it easier for the rest of the group to build on.

Differing the interview techniques would certainly accommodate a broader range of learning styles, which, is something many teachers struggle to obtain when teaching large groups. I think this is a fine idea if we can find someone involved in digitization that is a user of this technology.

I am not sure how many of you are in the SILS program or what contacts you have but I can get some names of some of the head-honchos here at UNC that are spear-heading the digitization movement if this would help anyone. I also work at ibiblio.org where we host the Gutenberg project so maybe I can get someone from there to go on record.

ma5on2002 said...

Alex C! You are housin this topic man. Good work.